SKU shown: 62465 (non-sterile Kimtech M3 pleat-style mask with knitted earloops).
Why cleanroom masks matter (source control, not hazard protection)
In controlled environments, people are often the largest contamination source. Talking, breathing, and routine movement generate particles and droplets that can deposit onto product, tooling, and sensitive surfaces.
Cleanroom masks are primarily used for source control: reducing what the operator releases into the environment.
This is a different objective than “respiratory protection.” The Kimtech M3 cleanroom mask is not a respirator and is not intended to protect against chemical vapors, gases, or airborne hazards.
Where this product is typically used
- ISO Class 3 and higher cleanrooms where a non-sterile cleanroom mask is specified by SOP and risk assessment.
- Microelectronics and precision manufacturing areas (semiconductor, disk drives, data storage, integrated circuits).
- Controlled inspection and assembly areas where operator comfort and consistent mask-wear compliance matter.
- General cleanroom programs where packaging discipline (double-bag) supports controlled entry workflows.
Why customers select the M3 mask family
- Cleanroom-compatible construction: low-lint outer layer and controlled manufacturing attributes published in the PDS.
- Published filtration + breathability: performance is published with test-method references (useful for qualification and SOP alignment).
- Comfort drives compliance: comfortable masks reduce face-touching and mid-shift “adjusting,” both of which elevate contamination risk.
- Packaging discipline: double-bag handling supports better gowning-room control.
- Supply continuity: SOSCleanroom has supported cleanrooms since 1981 and services long-running contamination-control programs with stable supply and documentation support.
Materials and construction (what matters in a cleanroom)
The M3 pleat-style mask is described with a low-lint polyethylene outer layer and a soft inner-facing layer to support comfort. A fully enclosed bendable nosepiece supports fit stability.
The earloops are ultrasonically bonded to reduce loose fibers and improve cleanroom compatibility.
Practical cleanroom takeaway: construction choices that reduce lint and improve fit reduce two common failure modes—fiber shedding and frequent face-touching/adjustment.
Specifications in context (qualification-friendly summary)
The table below consolidates manufacturer-published attributes that commonly matter for cleanroom qualification, receiving, and SOP alignment.
| Attribute |
Kimtech M3 (SKU 62465) |
| Sterility |
Non-sterile |
| Recommended cleanroom level |
ISO Class 3 and higher (program/SOP dependent) |
| Outer / inner layers |
Low-lint polyethylene outer; soft inner-facing layer |
| Fit features |
Knitted earloops; enclosed bendable nosepiece |
| Filtration (published) |
BFE ≥ 99%; PFE ≥ 99% (see PDS for test methods/particle sizes) |
| Breathability (published) |
Differential pressure < 5 mm H2O/cm2 (per PDS test method) |
| Particle generation (published) |
Helmke Drum Category I (low particle generation; see PDS) |
| Packaging |
500/case (10 boxes of 50); double bagged |
| Respiratory protection |
Not a respirator; not intended for hazardous airborne protection |
Performance and cleanliness considerations (what to teach operators)
For cleanroom masks, “performance” is typically evaluated as: filtration behavior (published via standardized methods), breathability (comfort and compliance), and particle generation (cleanroom suitability).
Just as important: the best mask fails if it is donned incorrectly or touched repeatedly during work.
| Characteristic |
What it means for use |
Published basis |
| BFE / PFE |
Supports source control by reducing release of bacteria-associated droplets and particulates (test conditions matter). |
Manufacturer PDS (ASTM-based methods referenced). |
| Breathability (ΔP) |
Lower breathing resistance can reduce “mask fiddling,” improving compliance and lowering contamination risk. |
Manufacturer PDS (ASTM-based method referenced). |
| Particle generation |
Lower particle generation supports cleaner airflow and less particle load in critical areas. |
Helmke Drum category published in manufacturer PDS. |
| Not a respirator |
Do not substitute cleanroom masks for hazard protection. Use site-approved respirators when required by EHS. |
Manufacturer/Seller positioning. |
Packaging and handling (how masks become contaminated)
Masks often become contaminated during donning, not during use. Double-bag packaging helps reduce exposure during controlled entry, but only if operators follow handling discipline:
open bags in the right zones, avoid bench placement, and only handle straps/edges. Treat the mask front as contamination-sensitive.
Donning (gowning) education: ISO-first, then EU Annex 1 context
ISO-first donning discipline (cleanroom operations focus)
- Step 1: hands and behavior: complete required hand hygiene; minimize talking during gowning; move deliberately to reduce particle shedding.
- Step 2: hair/beard containment: ensure all hair is fully contained before mask placement (exposed hair drives contamination).
- Step 3: mask placement: handle only earloops; seat mask over nose and under chin; shape nosepiece to reduce gaps.
- Step 4: do not touch the front: once donned, avoid adjusting the mask front. If fit is wrong, replace rather than “rework.”
- Step 5: integrate with hood/coverall: ensure hood/coverall closure does not dislodge the mask and does not leave exposed skin in the breathing zone (SOP dependent).
- Step 6: change-out triggers: replace masks if wet, damaged, contaminated, or at SOP-defined time intervals.
EU Annex 1 context (sterile manufacturing): Annex 1 places increased emphasis on contamination-control strategy, gowning suitability, and training discipline for sterile medicinal product manufacture.
If your facility operates under Annex 1 expectations, ensure mask selection (sterile vs. non-sterile), gowning sequence, and change-out cadence are explicitly defined and enforced by SOP and risk assessment.
In many Annex 1 applications, sterile masks and more stringent gowning systems are required for higher-grade areas.
Common failure modes (what to watch and correct)
- Mask below the nose: defeats source control; retrain immediately.
- Repeated face-touching/adjusting: increases contamination risk; replace mask if fit is poor.
- Loose nose fit / side gaps: reshape nosepiece; confirm compatible eyewear/hood interface.
- Improper storage: pocketing or bench placement contaminates masks; do not reuse staged masks.
- Wrong product for the grade: use sterile masks and higher-spec gowning where SOP/grade requires it.
Closest alternatives (what to compare)
Compare alternatives on: published BFE/PFE basis, differential pressure (comfort), particle generation (Helmke category), packaging discipline (double-bag), and whether sterile documentation is required for your entry process.
- Kimtech M3 sterile pleat-style masks: when SOP requires sterile packaging and sterilization documentation.
- Kimtech M3 pouch-style sterile masks: when comfort/airflow and breathing chamber are prioritized in aseptic workflows.
- Other cleanroom mask programs: compare published test methods and particle generation categories—not just “filtration” claims.
Critical environment fit (who this is for)
The non-sterile Kimtech M3 earloop mask is a strong fit for ISO Class 3+ controlled environments where the contamination-control objective is operator source control and where non-sterile PPE is acceptable by SOP.
If your process requires sterile entry, validated aseptic gowning, or Annex 1-driven sterility documentation, move to sterile mask configurations and align to your contamination-control strategy.
SOSCleanroom note about SOPs
The Technical Vault is written to help customers make informed contamination-control decisions and strengthen day-to-day technique.
It is not your facility’s Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), validation protocol, or batch record.
Customers are responsible for establishing, training, and enforcing SOPs that fit their cleanroom classification, products, processes, and regulatory obligations.
Always confirm material suitability, documentation requirements, and acceptance criteria using your quality system and documented methods.
If you adapt any guidance from this entry, treat it as a starting template. Review internally, approve formally, then qualify it for your specific surfaces, garments, airflow conditions, and risk profile.
Source basis
- SOSCleanroom product page (Kimtech M3 non-sterile, SKU 62465): https://www.soscleanroom.com/product/kimtech/kimberly-clark-kimtech-m3-cleanroom-face-masks/
- Manufacturer Product Data Sheet (Kimtech M3 Cleanroom Face Masks; test methods and performance basis): https://www.ansell.com/-/media/projects/ansell/website/pim/product-assets/kimtech/kimtech-m3-cleanroom-face-masks/kimtech-ktm3bt9m3-cleanroom-facemask-62452pds-102025.ashx
- ISO 14644-1 (cleanroom classification context): https://www.iso.org/standard/53394.html
- ISO 14644-5 (cleanroom operations context): https://www.iso.org/standard/26784.html
- EU GMP Annex 1 (sterile manufacture context): https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-08/20220825_gmp-an1_en_0.pdf
SOSCleanroom is the source for this Technical Vault entry.
Briefed and approved by the SOSCleanroom (SOS) staff.
If you have any questions please email us at Sales@SOSsupply.com
If you need additional information please try our SOSCleanroom specific AI ChatBot which draws from our extensive cleanroom specific libraries.
Last reviewed: Jan. 13, 2026
© 2026 SOSCleanroom