SOSCLEANROOM | NUCLEAR PHARMACY & RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CLEANROOMS
Protect the Preparation. Protect the People. Control the Environment.
An evidence-based reference to nuclear pharmacy operations: USP <825>, radiopharmaceutical cleanliness and aseptic controls, radioactive contamination, ALARA, wipe and swab selection, disinfectant programs, traceable supplies and practical quality-system readiness.
Explore the Guide ↓ Visit the Technical Vault →The starting point
Nuclear pharmacy quality combines pharmaceutical control with radiation protection.
Nuclear pharmacy is the specialized practice associated with radiopharmaceuticals — medicinal products that contain radionuclides and are used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Depending on the organization and its licenses, work may include receiving radioactive material, preparing or compounding radiopharmaceuticals, radiolabeling, quality control, dispensing, transport staging and managing radioactive waste. PET drug manufacturing and medical-use dose preparation are not legally or technically identical activities.
The defining challenge is that microbial contamination, ordinary particles and residues, radiation exposure, and radioactive contamination are different risks. A cleanroom can reduce airborne particles while failing to detect removable radioactive contamination; a low radiation reading does not establish that an exposed sterile preparation remains microbiologically acceptable.
Patient protection
Product quality & sterility
Worker protection
Exposure & radioactive material
Environmental control
Cleanroom & work surfaces
Quality assurance
Documentation & traceability
Critical distinction: “sterile,” “ISO Class 5,” “disinfected” and “radiologically cleared” mean different things. None of these terms proves the others.
Different radiopharmaceutical operations
Do not apply one cleanroom configuration to every nuclear pharmacy process.
| Operating context | Main activity / concern | What determines controls |
|---|---|---|
| State-licensed nuclear pharmacy | Preparation, compounding, dispensing or repackaging of radiopharmaceuticals as authorized. | Applicable USP <825> standards, FDA policies, state pharmacy requirements and NRC/Agreement State radioactive-material license conditions. |
| Hospital or clinical nuclear medicine service | Receiving, storage, dispensing or preparation for administration; activities can differ by site. | Authorized users and pharmacists, facility procedures, route and type of preparation, licensure, and the applicable scope of USP <825>. |
| PET drug production facility | Production and quality control of positron emission tomography drugs. | Applicable FDA CGMP requirements, including 21 CFR Part 212 for PET drug production, plus radiation licensing and product-specific approvals. |
| Therapeutic radiopharmaceutical program | Handling of radioactive therapy products, including those with different hazard and delivery characteristics. | Drug labeling, patient and occupational safeguards, radiation-safety program, applicable handling requirements, and site-specific hazardous-drug determination where relevant. |
| Research or investigational activity | Controlled use of research or investigational radiopharmaceuticals. | Applicable investigational rules, protocol approvals, drug-quality expectations, material licenses and institutional controls. |
No universal ISO Class 5 or ISO Class 7 statement can cover all of these settings. Classification, aseptic conditions and containment must be mapped to the actual manipulation and currently applicable chapter, license, manufacturer instructions and facility plan.
2026 regulatory reference
USP <825> is central — but it is not the only governing source.
As of this review, the January 1, 2024 version of USP General Chapter <825> is the operative published basis identified by USP. USP subsequently published proposed changes for comment, including changes discussed in 2026; a proposal should not be treated as an effective requirement. Always confirm the current official chapter through USP and the requirements adopted or enforced in your jurisdiction. USP radiopharmaceutical chapter.
| Reference | Relevant scope | Important qualification |
|---|---|---|
| USP <825> | Radiopharmaceutical preparation, compounding, dispensing and repackaging. | Radiopharmaceutical-specific practices; use the currently official text and verify jurisdictional enforcement. |
| USP <797> | Sterile pharmaceutical compounding; referenced concepts and related quality controls. | Do not automatically import a <797> immediate-use limit or classification into a distinct <825> scenario without checking the applicable scope. |
| USP <800> | Hazardous drug handling when the applicable drug and activity meet that chapter's scope. | A radioactive drug is not automatically a USP <800> hazardous drug solely because it emits ionizing radiation. |
| NRC / Agreement State: 10 CFR Parts 20 & 35 | Radiation protection, radioactive-material medical-use licensing and authorized persons. | The license and applicable jurisdiction determine site-specific conditions and surveys. |
| FDA radiopharmaceutical guidance | Federal policies for state-licensed pharmacies and other entities compounding or repackaging radiopharmaceuticals. | Do not assume general Section 503A compounding exemptions apply to radiopharmaceuticals. |
| FDA: 21 CFR Part 212 | Current good manufacturing practice for positron emission tomography (PET) drugs. | The PET CGMP framework is not a blanket requirement for every dispensing-only nuclear pharmacy. |
| ISO 14644-1:2015; ISO 14644-5:2025 | Airborne particle classification; operational programs for cleanrooms. | Neither standard alone establishes radiological clearance, product sterility, or radioactive-material license compliance. |
Why the regulatory distinction matters: FDA states that radiopharmaceuticals are excluded from the usual FD&C Act Section 503A compounding exemptions. Its specific radiopharmaceutical guidance explains policies for certain state-licensed nuclear pharmacies and other covered facilities. Facilities should determine their own legal and regulatory framework, not borrow a rule meant for ordinary sterile compounding. FDA radiopharmaceutical guidance.
Also see the SOSCleanroom USP <797> sterile-compounding guide and USP <800> hazardous-drug guide for their separate scopes.
Engineering and zoning
A shielded workstation is not automatically an aseptic primary engineering control.
Radiopharmacy design often has to reconcile air cleanliness, aseptic technique, radioactive-material containment, operator access and shielding. A hot cell, shielded enclosure or isolator can serve different roles, but radiation shielding alone does not prove the critical air quality needed for an aseptic operation. Conversely, a clean air device does not replace a licensed radiation-protection or containment system.
Critical work zone
Aseptic protection
Segregated processing
Controlled transfers
Shielded areas
Radiation engineering
Monitoring zones
Different instruments
How to evaluate a room or engineering control
- Classification and recovery: determine the air cleanliness level required during the specific process, including operation with personnel and equipment in place.
- Airflow and access: assess how shielding, doors, lead-glass viewing panels and manipulators affect airflow patterns and cleaning access.
- Surfaces: choose compatible, cleanable materials and maintain documented methods for difficult-to-reach corners and critical interfaces.
- Transfer points: establish outer-packaging removal, wipe-down, dedicated tools and clean-to-dirty boundaries without violating radiation-containment rules.
- Maintenance: define safe entry, coordination with the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO), monitoring, documentation and conditions for return to service.
ISO 14644-5:2025 describes operational control programs for cleanrooms, including personnel, cleaning, maintenance and material transfers. It is not a substitute for the nuclear pharmacy chapter or NRC/Agreement State requirements. ISO 14644-5:2025 overview.
The critical technical distinction
Cleaning, microbial disinfection and radioactive decontamination are different processes.
| Activity | Objective | How effectiveness is established | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical cleaning | Remove soils, dust, visible film, nonvolatile residues and loose particulate from an allowed surface. | Defined procedure, inspection, cleanliness testing or sampling where appropriate. | Cleaning is not a validated disinfection claim and does not establish radiological clearance. |
| Surface disinfection | Reduce specified microorganisms using an appropriate disinfectant on a compatible surface. | EPA label claims and contact time, facility validation/monitoring where required. | A disinfectant does not necessarily remove radioactive material or inactivate spores. |
| Sporicidal treatment | Control bacterial spores where a sporicidal step is required by the program. | Product-specific labeled performance and facility procedure. | Sporicidal chemistry can be corrosive or leave residues; it does not inherently remove radionuclides. |
| Radioactive decontamination | Remove or control radioactive material on surfaces, objects or personnel under approved radiation-safety procedures. | Proper radiation surveys and, when specified, removable-contamination measurements. | Washing or wiping can redistribute contamination; contaminated consumables may become radioactive waste. |
| Hazardous-drug deactivation / decontamination | Address hazardous drug residues for covered drugs or activities. | Appropriate drug-specific process and verification where required. | USP <800> processes are not a universal replacement for radiological surveys or microbial disinfection. |
Use the correct acceptance criterion: a clean-looking surface may still contain radionuclides or viable organisms. Similarly, a negative microbial environmental sample cannot be substituted for a radiation survey. Investigation and restart decisions should be governed by separate quality and RSO criteria.
Practical contamination control
Design a controlled, compatible cleaning and disinfection program.
In nuclear pharmacy, an effective cleaning program has to account for restricted spaces, difficult shielded-enclosure geometry, time pressure, potentially contaminated waste, material compatibility and aseptic critical sites. The objective is not to use the strongest chemical available, but to apply the correct agent, technique and verification in the appropriate zone.
Step 01
Determine the zone and required outcome
Step 02
Confirm compatible materials
Step 03
Apply the approved method
Step 04
Meet disinfectant label conditions
Step 05
Verify and document
Sterile 70% IPA: useful, but not a universal solution
Sterile 70% isopropyl alcohol is often considered for compatible controlled-environment tasks because sterile supply, dispensing format and traceability can be important. However, sterile IPA does not replace a required cleaning step, has no inherent sporicidal claim, and is not proof of radioactive decontamination. Review the product label, SDS, flammability controls, material compatibility, and required drying instructions. Where legally required for a disinfectant claim, use an appropriately registered and labeled product.
The U.S. EPA advises that the disinfectant surface must remain visibly wet for its labeled contact time, and the method of application must match the product label. EPA disinfectant directions.
Handling wet consumables and process residue
Pre-wetted wipes can reduce manual solvent-dosing variability, but their solvent, concentration, package configuration and material must be appropriate for the task. Residual solution near instruments, radiation detectors, lead shielding, seals or electrical equipment may require special review. Any wiper or swab that contacts radioactive material must enter the approved survey, segregation and waste pathway; do not treat the product as ordinary trash based only on its cleanroom packaging.
Radiation protection and contamination
ALARA belongs to the radiation-safety program, not to a wiper data sheet.
NRC regulations and applicable Agreement State license conditions govern radioactive-material protection. ALARA means maintaining exposures as low as reasonably achievable using appropriate controls, which can include limiting time near radioactive sources, increasing distance, shielding, safe containment, work planning and relevant monitoring. These controls are selected by trained personnel and the licensed radiation-safety program.
Exposure control
Time, distance & shielding
Contamination control
Prevent spread of radioactive material
PPE boundaries
Gloves are not gamma shields
Incident readiness
Stop, isolate, assess & escalate
Appropriate surveys and monitoring are described in the NRC medical-licensee guidance. A contamination survey should not be replaced by visual inspection, an alcohol wipe, or airborne particle counting. NRC medical-use FAQ: surveys.
Waste reminder: used gloves, swabs, pads, wipes, packaging, absorbents and other items may become radioactive waste if contaminated. They must be assessed, labeled, segregated and disposed of under the applicable license and RSO-approved waste procedures. SOScleanroom consumables are not substitutes for calibrated radiation instrumentation or licensed waste services.
Choose supplies by task
Match sterile status, shedding, absorbency and material compatibility to the procedure.
| Consumable | Key selection questions | Common evaluation context |
|---|---|---|
| Sterile dry polyester wipers | Is sterility documented for the exact SKU? What are particle/fiber shedding and absorbency characteristics? Is packaging suitable for the zone? | Critical-area-compatible wipe-down of approved surfaces or support equipment where specified. |
| Sterile pre-wetted wipers | Is the wetting chemistry correct? Are sterile status, wetness, packaging and lot identification available? | Controlled delivery of an approved solution; not automatic sporicidal, radiological or sterile-process validation. |
| Sterile precision swabs | Will the head reach a seam or interface without shedding? Is the head chemistry-compatible and packaged for the required handling? | Approved detail cleaning and controlled sampling of crevices, ports, equipment interfaces and fixtures. |
| Cleanroom mops / covers | Does the system access shielded equipment or floor geometry? Does it release fibers? Can handles/covers be segregated? | Controlled room and equipment housekeeping according to the zone-specific method. |
| Nitrile or other cleanroom gloves | Sterile versus nonsterile, barrier integrity, fit, chemical compatibility, donning method, documentation and any HD requirements. | Personnel contamination control and chemical-barrier needs; ordinary gloves do not provide radiation shielding. |
| Sterile alcohol / disinfectants | Product grade, legitimate antimicrobial claim, compatibility, label directions, sterility, SDS, expiration and package. | Routine cleaning/disinfection steps where required; never assume one agent covers radiation, microorganisms and spores. |
| Adhesive mats / cleanroom packaging | Placement, transfer sequence, waste handling and suitability around radiological boundaries. | Potential reduction of tracked particulate at selected entries; not a substitute for contamination surveys. |
What information should purchasing request?
- Product identification: manufacturer SKU, exact dimensions, substrate, packaging units and suitability limits.
- Quality evidence: available technical data, sterility statements, lot/expiry traceability and any relevant certificates for that precise item.
- Chemical compatibility: SDS, proposed surface and equipment materials, and restrictions related to the required solvent or disinfectant.
- Change control: whether substitutions require pharmacist/QA review; product naming similarity does not establish equivalence.
- Supply continuity: staged quantities, sterile-package integrity and replenishment planning for shifts, outages and seasonal volume changes.
Verified SOScleanroom examples
Individual product listings to evaluate against your approved bill of materials.
The listings below were checked on the SOScleanroom website. They are selection candidates, not representations of product approval for a licensed nuclear-pharmacy procedure. Verify sterile status, pack size, current availability, manufacturer specifications and intended use before procurement.
Sterile dry 9 x 9
Texwipe TX3049 Vertex Wiper
Sterile dry 12 x 12
Texwipe TX3042 Vertex Wiper
Sterile pre-wetted 9 x 9
Texwipe TX3049P 70% IPA Wiper
Sterile IPA solution
Texwipe TX3270 70% IPA, 16 oz
Sterile detail cleaning
Texwipe STX705P Cotton Swab
Sterile foam detail swab
Texwipe STX708A Circular Foam
Sterile foam detail swab
Texwipe STX712A Rectangular Foam
Sterile polyester swab
Texwipe STX763 Polyester Swab
Entry-control mats
Texwipe CleanStep 18 x 36
Explore broader catalog families: sterile cleanroom wipers, precision swabs, cleanroom gloves and apparel, cleaning and disinfection solutions and cleanroom mop systems. Product pages may change and some items have clearance or special-order status; check availability rather than assuming immediate inventory.
Different evidence, different purposes
Environmental monitoring is not radiation surveying, and neither alone releases a drug product.
| Measurement / record | Primary question | How it is used |
|---|---|---|
| Nonviable airborne particle counts | Is the monitored air cleanliness consistent with the specified ISO classification or trend? | Evaluate environment, qualification and operational performance; cannot identify viable or radioactive contamination by itself. |
| Viable environmental monitoring | What microbial contamination is recoverable in the specified locations and process? | Identify trends and investigate excursions; selection of method and frequency follow applicable quality requirements. |
| Surface cleaning/disinfection records | Was the authorized chemistry applied correctly under the SOP? | Capture agent, lot, conditions, operator, contact time and deviations when required. |
| Radiation exposure-rate surveys | What radiation field is present at relevant locations or during a task? | Demonstrate adherence to the radiation-protection program; instrument and survey requirements depend on the material license. |
| Removable radioactive contamination assessments | Is transferable radioactive material present on specified surfaces? | Use approved instruments and methods, with site-specific investigation and release criteria. |
| Radiopharmaceutical product-quality checks | Does the drug product meet the specifications applicable to its identity, quality, purity and use? | Separately controlled by labeling, pharmacopoeial requirements, manufacturing/compounding procedures and quality release authorities. |
Keep the monitoring systems linked through deviation control, but do not collapse different measurements into a single “clean” indicator. A cleanroom certificate does not certify every surface or aseptic manipulation; a radionuclide decay period does not establish sterility.
Audit-ready quality records
Build documentation that explains what was done, by whom and under which authority.
- Authority and scope: licenses, applicable USP chapter editions, policies, authorization to perform the task and responsibility of the pharmacist, RSO and quality unit.
- People and technique: required training, aseptic qualification where applicable, glove and garment technique, periodic evaluation and retraining.
- Engineering controls: certification and service history for qualified aseptic devices, equipment condition, maintenance interventions and return-to-service approvals.
- Cleaning and disinfection: written zone-specific methods, materials, activity restrictions, frequencies, label instructions and completion records.
- Radiological controls: approved survey procedures and instruments, required monitoring records, spill/decontamination documentation and waste traceability.
- Product records: lot and expiry, preparation or repackaging record when applicable, quality checks, packaging/labeling, disposition and deviations.
- Supplies: item-level lot documentation as available, current specifications, authorized substitutes and evidence of change-control decisions.
- Investigations: trend review, deviations, excursion impact assessments, corrective/preventive actions and documented release decisions.
Supplier documentation assists audit readiness, but a technical data sheet or certificate for a wiper does not establish that a radiopharmaceutical batch, operation or room complies with USP <825> or NRC license conditions.
Suggested site-readiness checklist
An educational self-assessment for nuclear pharmacy managers and technical purchasers.
01 — Regulatory map
Know what applies
02 — Zoning and airflow
Protect the critical site
03 — Consumable qualification
Prevent uncontrolled substitutions
04 — Cleaning effectiveness
Separate acceptance methods
05 — Radiation preparedness
Know the RSO pathway
06 — Monitoring and release
Know who approves restart
Use this framework as a discussion aid, not as a compliance certificate. The facility must translate it into controlled procedures, instrument-specific requirements, acceptance limits and sign-offs applicable to its authorized work.
Troubleshooting and event response
Common early warning signs and the appropriate first investigation.
| Observed problem | Questions to investigate | Controlled response theme |
|---|---|---|
| Microbial trend increases after equipment cleaning | Does the agent have the intended claim? Was contact time achieved? Were application, access and residues controlled? | Protect affected processes, investigate technique, chemical method and environmental monitoring with QA/pharmacy leadership. |
| Recurring particles after material transfer | Are packages shedding? Is outer packaging crossing boundaries? Are wipes/gloves introducing fibers? | Inspect transfer sequence, material packaging and cleaning, then re-evaluate monitoring or affected operations. |
| Radioactive contamination suspected on work surface | What radionuclide, activity, location and exposure conditions are involved? Has spread or personnel contact occurred? | Activate RSO-approved isolation, survey, assessment, decontamination and waste procedures; do not improvise cleanup. |
| Sterile wipe runs out mid-shift | Can an alternative meet the same approved specification and package/sterility requirements? | Apply established substitution approval and change control; do not equate item appearance with validated equivalence. |
| Disinfectant haze or equipment damage | Was material/chemical compatibility verified? Were residues, drying and dilution handled correctly? | Pause the affected cleaning method and involve equipment, pharmacy and QA owners before substitution. |
| Facility engineering control serviced | Were radiation access and decontamination controls followed? What recertification and release checks are needed? | Coordinate RSO, engineering and pharmacy/QA authorization before returning the area to service. |
Suggested SOP library
Procedure modules worth maintaining as separate controlled documents.
SOP 01
Area zoning and material entry
SOP 02
Wiper, swab and glove selection
SOP 03
Surface cleaning and disinfection
SOP 04
Radiological contamination incident
SOP 05
Environmental and radiological monitoring
SOP 06
Change control and continuity of supply
For staff training, cross-reference SOSCleanroom Training Materials & How-To Guides, Critical Cleaning and our Technical Vault. These educational resources support preparation of local procedures but do not replace validated instructions or professional supervision.
Authority beyond the catalog
Important nuclear pharmacy capabilities that are not ordinary consumables.
A reliable radiopharmaceutical program may require capabilities beyond anything in a cleanroom distributor catalog: shielding design, ventilation and hot-cell engineering, calibrated dose calibrators and radiation instruments, radiopharmaceutical quality testing, PET drug manufacturing expertise, aseptic-process qualification, HEPA certification, medical physics advice and licensed radioactive-waste disposal. These are specialized disciplines.
SOScleanroom can support the consumable side with candidate sterile wipers, swabs, cleaning solutions, gloves, apparel, contamination-control accessories, manufacturer documentation and purchasing support. The site does not replace your licensed nuclear pharmacist, RSO, Qualified Person or quality unit, accredited test laboratory, engineering specialist, or regulator.
Primary-source reading list
Regulations, standards and regulator guidance behind this guide.
- USP radiopharmaceutical practice: USP General Chapter <825> — consult official chapter text and current published status; proposed revisions are not automatically operative.
- USP sterile compounding: USP General Chapter <797> — sterile compounding framework, interpreted in relation to radiopharmaceutical-specific requirements.
- FDA radiopharmacy policy: FDA radiopharmaceutical compounding and repackaging guidance — distinguishes radiopharmaceuticals from general Section 503A exemptions.
- FDA PET production: FDA CGMP regulations overview — includes 21 CFR Part 212; see also PET aseptic process validation guidance.
- NRC authorized nuclear pharmacists: NRC authorized individuals and licensing toolkit — role and authorization context for Part 35.
- NRC radiation and contamination surveys: NRC Part 35 medical-licensee FAQs — separate survey requirements and radiation protection program concepts.
- ISO cleanroom framework: ISO 14644-1:2015 and ISO 14644-5:2025 — airborne-particle classification and cleanroom operations.
- Disinfectant claims and contact time: EPA selected registered disinfectants and label directions — regulatory use directions for EPA-registered disinfectants.
- 2026 proposed chapter changes: Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging comments on the draft USP <825> — confirms draft-revision status, not an effective amendment.
Standards and their interpretations can change. Refer to the published standard or regulator itself for binding text, current edition, jurisdictional implementation and applicable facility obligations.
Nuclear pharmacy FAQs
Straight answers to common cleanliness and supply questions.
What is nuclear pharmacy?
Nuclear pharmacy is a specialized pharmacy practice involving radioactive medicinal products used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Authorized activities and responsible personnel depend on the facility and its licenses.
Does USP <825> replace USP <797>?
USP <825> is the radiopharmaceutical-specific practice chapter. USP <797> establishes a broader sterile-compounding framework. How each provision applies depends on activity and jurisdiction; do not simply substitute one chapter's limits for another.
Is USP <825> official in 2026?
The January 1, 2024 version was published as the official basis, and subsequent changes were proposed for comment. Consult USP for the latest official text before adopting any revisions into controlled procedures.
Does every nuclear pharmacy require ISO Class 5 cleanrooms?
No single ISO class describes every receiving, dispensing, processing or manufacturing task. Where aseptic critical sites require qualified primary engineering controls, their air cleanliness and use must meet the applicable process-specific requirements.
Can sterile 70% IPA remove radioactive contamination?
IPA may have a role in approved compatible cleaning or microbial-control steps, but sterile IPA is not a general radiological decontamination method. Radioactive contamination must be evaluated and addressed under RSO-directed procedures and appropriate surveys.
Do sterile wipes protect against radiation?
No. Sterile wipes can help control particles and microbial introduction in appropriate tasks. They do not shield against penetrating ionizing radiation. If contaminated, they may require radioactive waste handling.
Will nitrile gloves protect workers from gamma radiation?
Ordinary nitrile gloves are a contact barrier and may help prevent skin contamination; they are not an effective shield for penetrating gamma radiation. Radiation protection relies on controls selected for the radionuclide and task.
Is an ISO cleanroom certificate enough to prove a nuclear pharmacy is compliant?
No. Air classification is one element. A facility may also need process-specific aseptic qualification, procedures, training, regulatory and license compliance, radioactive surveys and quality-system evidence.
When are sporicidal disinfectants necessary?
A sporicidal program may be required or appropriate under the applicable sterile-processing standards and facility program. Chemistry, use site, frequency, residue management and contact time must match controlled requirements; a sporicide does not automatically remove radioactive material.
Can SOScleanroom determine our radiation safety program or beyond-use dates?
No. Those decisions belong to the licensed facility and applicable professionals under product, regulatory and quality requirements. SOScleanroom can help identify and source cleanroom consumables and available manufacturer documentation.
Are 2026 USP <825> proposals already mandatory?
Not merely because they were published for comment. Confirm formal approval, official effective date and jurisdictional adoption before changing SOPs or training.
Why is traceability so important for swabs, wipes and solutions?
Lot, sterilization status, expiration, packaging and approved equivalence can affect deviation investigations and controlled process reproducibility. Product suitability always remains application-specific.
SOSCLEANROOM | TECHNICAL CONSUMABLE & PROCUREMENT SUPPORT
Standardize Cleanroom Supplies Without Compromising Your Approved Process.
Whether you need a sterile wiper specification, a documented swab material, a qualified glove format or assistance comparing cleaning consumables, SOScleanroom can help you evaluate product options and available manufacturer information. Share your required SKUs, sterile status, packaging and traceability needs, purchasing volume and delivery constraints. Your facility remains responsible for process approval, radiation safety and compliance.
Request a Quote → Cleanroom Purchasing Programs →Questions? 800-443-7101
Educational scope: Research reviewed October 15, 2026. This page is general technical education, not medical, radiopharmaceutical preparation, regulatory, occupational radiation, or legal instruction. Follow the official current standards, radioactive-material license, applicable agency/Agreement State requirements, pharmacist-in-charge, RSO, approved QA procedures and manufacturer directions. SOScleanroom does not certify products as suitable for all nuclear-pharmacy operations or provide nuclear pharmacy licenses, radiation engineering or radioactive-waste disposal. Product availability and specifications may change.