The Technical Vault
By SOSCleanroom
MICROFLEX® 93-260
3-layer synthetic composite barrier
AQL 0.65 (Inspection Level I)
EN ISO 374-1 Type A (JKLOPST) + EN ISO 374-5 Virus
Antistatic (EN1149)
Powder-free + silicone-free
Ansell MICROFLEX® 93-260 chemical-resistant polychloroprene disposable gloves: thin dexterity, wide barrier confidence, and low pinhole risk
MICROFLEX® 93-260 (green), extended cuff, textured fingers.
1) Practical solutions in a critical environment
Chemical handling is one of the fastest ways to create both a safety event and a contamination event at the same time: splash exposure, residues transferred from gloves to tools, and secondary touchpoints that propagate risk into packaging, labels, or controlled spaces. MICROFLEX® 93-260 is designed for those “high-consequence but still dexterity-critical” moments—where you need a tougher barrier than a standard disposable exam glove, but you still have to handle small components, caps, fittings, and dispensing tools without losing control.
Best-in-class glove sourcing matters: SOSCleanroom does not carry “inferior-to-save-cost” glove options for critical environments. We position Ansell as a best-in-class glove line because glove failures are expensive—technician exposure, product risk, rework, and investigation time. Cleanroom Technology also reported that SOS Cleanroom Supply became an Ansell authorized distributor (June 20, 2023).
2) What it’s for
Based on the SOSCleanroom product listing and Ansell technical data sheet, MICROFLEX® 93-260 is commonly selected for:
- Inspection, selecting, and checking parts
- Assembly and inspection of components
- Equipment repair and maintenance; production line support
- Oil, fluids, and filter change; general purpose aftermarket tasks
- Blending/compounding solids and liquids; sample taking and processing
- Transferring liquids and solids between vessels, tanks, and process equipment
Primary industries frequently associated with this glove include aerospace, automotive, life sciences, chemical, agriculture, machinery/equipment, metal fabrication, utilities, and warehousing.
3) Why should customers consider this glove
- 3-layer barrier design intended to improve resistance to harsh chemicals versus typical single-layer disposables.
- Thin, dexterous build (typical finger thickness 0.20 mm / 7.9 mil) for better control when handling small objects and tools.
- Low pinhole risk target with AQL 0.65 (Inspection Level I) to support consistent barrier integrity.
- Wide standards footprint in published documentation, including EN ISO 374-1:2016 Type A (JKLOPST), EN ISO 374-5:2016 Virus, and PPE Category III risk positioning.
- Operational controls friendly: powder-free, silicone-free, and antistatic (EN1149) characteristics that many programs prefer for sensitive work.
- Special-use testing notes published by the manufacturer: tested for chemotherapy drugs in accordance with ASTM D6978 (not listed in a U.S. FDA 510(k)) and fentanyl tested (per product details on SOSCleanroom and the technical data sheet).
4) Materials and construction
MICROFLEX® 93-260 is a synthetic composite disposable glove built from nitrile + neoprene (polychloroprene) in a three-layer design. It is not made from natural rubber latex, is powder-free, and uses textured fingers to support grip under wet/chemical conditions. The glove is silicone-free, antistatic (EN1149), and uses an extended cuff with published minimum glove length of ≥ 285 mm (11.2 in).
5) Specifications (at-a-glance)
| Parameter |
Published value |
| Manufacturer / model |
Ansell MICROFLEX® 93-260 |
| Material |
Nitrile, Neoprene (Polychloroprene) |
| Construction |
3-layer synthetic composite (chemical-resistant disposable) |
| Color |
Green |
| External surface |
Textured fingers |
| Cuff |
Extended; glove length ≥ 285 mm (11.2 in) |
| Thickness |
Finger: 0.20 mm (7.9 mil); Palm: 0.198 mm (7.9 mil) |
| Freedom from holes |
0.65 AQL (Inspection Level I) |
| Powder |
Powder-free |
| Silicone-free |
Yes |
| Antistatic |
Yes (EN1149) |
| Sterility |
Non-sterile |
| Chemotherapy drug testing note |
Tested per ASTM D6978 (not listed in U.S. FDA 510(k)) |
| Country of origin |
Sri Lanka |
| Case pack (bulk) |
50 gloves/dispenser; 10 dispensers/case; 500 gloves/case |
| Cleanroom ISO class |
Not stated in the posted manufacturer TDS or the SOSCleanroom product listing |
6) Specifications in context
This glove’s “signal” is the combination of thin handling control (roughly 7.9 mil) and chemical barrier confidence from a composite, multi-layer construction. In practice, it fits well when:
- You need a broader chemical resistance envelope than typical single-layer disposable exam gloves.
- Your work involves small parts and tools where thicker chemical gloves reduce control and increase drops, spills, or overtightening/undertightening risk.
- You want a published, program-friendly quality marker (AQL 0.65) to reduce pinhole-driven surprises during chemical contact tasks.
- You rely on documentation and training consistency (standards, DoC, and clearly stated storage instructions) to support audits and EHS reviews.
Trade-offs to plan for: textured-finger disposables are not a substitute for heavy mechanical cut/abrasion protection, and chemical compatibility is always chemical- and temperature-specific. The right way to qualify the glove is to match your chemical list to published permeation/compatibility data where available, then document change-out rules in your EHS program.
7) Cleanliness metrics (what’s published vs. what you should verify)
For chemical-resistant disposables, the most meaningful “cleanliness” markers are often defect control (pinholes), additive controls (powder, silicone), and static behavior (where relevant). Published markers for MICROFLEX® 93-260 are summarized below.
| Metric / control |
Published statement |
| Freedom from holes |
0.65 AQL (Inspection Level I) |
| Powder |
Powder-free |
| Silicone |
Silicone-free |
| Antistatic |
Yes (EN1149) |
| Sterility / cleanroom particle metrics |
Not stated (this model is published as non-sterile; ISO cleanroom class not stated) |
Qualification note: If you are using this glove inside a controlled environment, verify that your own facility requirements are met (particle/defect tolerance, chemical residue risk, and changeover discipline). Where aseptic processing is in scope, reference U.S. FDA aseptic processing guidance first, then use EU GMP Annex 1 as a global benchmark for contamination control strategy thinking—without assuming it is a U.S. legal requirement.
8) Packaging, documentation, and traceability
Standard bulk packaging for the SOSCleanroom case option is published as 50 gloves per dispenser; 10 dispensers per case; 500 gloves per case. The manufacturer technical data sheet also publishes a retail pack configuration (6 gloves per pack; 50 packs per case; 300 gloves per case) and size code mapping for ordering control.
Documentation available on the SOSCleanroom product page includes a Product Data Sheet and both EU and UK Declarations of Conformity. For programs that rely on audit-ready PPE files, that “paperwork continuity” reduces time spent chasing compliance artifacts during incident review, safety committee meetings, or customer audits.
9) Best-practice use (field-ready guidance)
- Start with the chemical list. Confirm chemical identity, concentration, temperature, and contact type (splash vs. immersion vs. continuous contact). Select based on published compatibility/permeation resources when available, then document the decision.
- Use change-out triggers that operators can follow. Event-based triggers (splash, unknown contact, torn glove, heavy wet-out) are often more realistic than time-only rules—then add time limits where your risk assessment calls for it.
- Donning discipline improves barrier integrity. Dry hands first; avoid fingernail snags; pull from the cuff and avoid overstretching at the fingertips. If you tear one glove during donning, change both so you do not “forget” the mismatch.
- Protect the glove from mechanical damage. Composite chemical disposables are not designed for sharp edges, burrs, or aggressive abrasion. Deburr tools and fittings; slow down on clamps, hose barbs, and metal corners.
- Double-gloving can be strategic. In some programs, a chemical-resistant outer glove over a compatible inner glove improves doffing safety and limits cross-transfer. Any double-glove approach should be documented in your hazard assessment and training.
- Doffing is where exposures happen. Treat the exterior as contaminated; remove slowly; avoid snapping; dispose per your waste stream rules; wash hands after removal.
Customer SOP disclaimer: SOSCleanroom provides best-practice guidance and suggested templates to support customer training and continuous improvement. Customers are responsible for developing, approving, validating, and maintaining their own SOPs and safety procedures based on their facility, chemicals, products, regulatory obligations, and risk assessments.
10) Common failure modes
- Assuming “chemical-resistant” means universal. Compatibility is chemical- and temperature-specific; unknown mixtures deserve extra conservatism and documentation.
- Puncture/tear from sharp features. Hose clamps, tool edges, and burrs can compromise a thin glove quickly.
- Extended use past the task risk window. The longer the contact, the greater the chance of permeation or exterior contamination transfer to clean surfaces.
- Improper sizing. Undersized gloves increase tear risk and hand fatigue; oversized gloves increase snagging and loss of control.
- Poor doffing technique. Contaminating hands during removal is a common root cause in chemical exposure investigations.
11) Closest competitors
The most relevant alternatives are other chemical-protection gloves that trade off dexterity, cut resistance, or chemical breadth. Common cross-shops include:
- Ansell AlphaTec 37-155 (chemical-resistant nitrile): typically selected when durability and wet grip matter and the chemical set is known.
- Ansell AlphaTec 58-735 (chemical + cut-resistant nitrile): a better fit where chemical exposure and cut/abrasion hazards exist on the same job.
- Comparable multi-layer chemical disposable gloves: consider only if you can obtain equivalent standards documentation and compatibility/permeation data for your application.
12) Program fit (U.S. standards first, then global benchmarks)
In the United States, glove selection and use is commonly anchored in an OSHA-aligned PPE program (hazard assessment, training, change-out rules, and incident response). In regulated life-science environments, glove behavior also intersects with broader contamination control expectations—reference U.S. FDA aseptic processing guidance and cGMP fundamentals first, then use EU GMP Annex 1 as a secondary benchmark to strengthen contamination control strategy and operator discipline where relevant.
Texwipe pairing guidance (kept ISO-accurate): This glove’s published documentation does not state an ISO cleanroom class. If your work occurs in a controlled environment, match Texwipe low-linting wipers, cleanroom swabs, and validated cleaning chemistries to your room’s ISO classification and to the specific solvent/disinfectant in use (including sporicidal rotation where applicable), then qualify in your site CCS/cleaning validation plan. SOSCleanroom is the authorized Master Distributor of ITW Texwipe for the United States market, and for over 35 years, SOS and Texwipe have been close partners.
Operator tip for chemical tasks that touch controlled spaces:
- Define “dirty glove” vs. “clean task” boundaries (transfer hatches, tool cribs, label stations, pass-throughs).
- Train glove-change moments: after chemical contact, before touching clean packaging, and before entering cleaner zones.
- Use low-linting wipes/swabs for point cleanup on tools and contact surfaces after a chemical handling task—then document the corrective action per your quality system.
13) Source basis
SOSCleanroom product page (primary): https://www.soscleanroom.com/product/brands/ansell-93-260-microflex-chemical-resistant-polychloroprene-gloves/
Manufacturer reference page: https://www.ansell.com/us/en/products/microflex-93-260
Product Data Sheet (SOS-hosted PDF copy): https://www.soscleanroom.com/content/ansell2/microflex-93-260_pds_us.pdf (rev/date as published in file)
EU Declaration of Conformity (SOS-hosted PDF): https://www.soscleanroom.com/content/ansell2/microflex-93-260_microflex%C2%AE-93-260_eu_20250930_declaration%20of%20conformity.pdf
UK Declaration of Conformity (SOS-hosted PDF): https://www.soscleanroom.com/content/ansell2/microflex-93-260_microflex%C2%AE-93-260_uk_20250930_declaration%20of%20conformity.pdf
Manufacturer PDF links (customer convenience):
Product Data Sheet: https://www.ansell.com/us/en/products/microflex-93-260/pds/kvMRQRrP0igaS4ZOAuBng
Declaration of Conformity: https://www.ansell.com/us/en/products/microflex-93-260/doc/qq3ctmwclccmxtfk1rm5g
UK Declaration of Conformity: https://www.ansell.com/us/en/products/microflex-93-260/ukdoc/4chiHL7E0MVmiEhVpXjwww
Third-party validation (Ansell authorization): https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/sos-cleanroom-supply-becomes-ansell-authorised-distributor-209576
U.S. FDA aseptic processing guidance (reference-first for U.S. customers): https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/sterile-drug-products-produced-aseptic-processing-current-good-manufacturing-practice
ISO cleanroom classification reference: https://www.iso.org/standard/53394.html
ASTM and IEST organizational references (qualification/education): https://www.astm.org | https://www.iest.org
EU GMP Annex 1 (secondary/global benchmark): https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-08/20220825_gmp-an1_en_0.pdf
SOSCleanroom is the source for this Technical Vault entry.
Briefed and approved by the SOSCleanroom (SOS) staff.
If you have any questions please email us at Sales@SOSsupply.com or give us a call at (214)340-8574.
If you need additional information please try our SOSCleanroom specific AI ChatBot which draws from our extensive cleanroom specific libraries.
Last reviewed: Jan. 11, 2026
© 2026 SOSCleanroom.com
