The Technical Vault
By SOSCleanroom
ISO 14644 Operations Control
Cellulose / Polyester Blend
High Absorbency Pickup
General Wiping / Spill Control
Bag-in-Bag Packaging
Non-Sterile (Dry)
Dry Wiper (Alcohol Pairing Allowed)
Two-Fiber Pickup Control in a 12" x 12" Format: why TX612 TechniCloth® is a go-to wiper when absorbency is the constraint
Texwipe TX612 TechniCloth® (12" x 12") is a hydroentangled, nonwoven cleanroom wiper made from a cellulose / polyester blend
(commonly referenced as 55% cellulose / 45% polyester). This construction is used when the operator problem is straightforward:
pick up liquid quickly, control spread, and reduce wipe count during routine wipe-downs and aqueous spill response.
In many facilities, “cleaning variability” is actually absorbency mismatch—the wipe cannot hold enough fluid, so it smears, pushes liquid into seams,
or turns a small event into a larger contamination footprint.
TX612 is a dry wiper, which keeps method flexibility high: you can run it dry for pickup, or apply chemistry to the wiper for a controlled damp-film pass.
As always, the real control comes from the method: wetness target, folding/face rotation, stroke pattern, and discard point.
Operations takeaway: TX612 is most effective when your SOP treats “absorbency” as a control: blot/lift (don’t scrub), defined face rotation, and clear change-out triggers before the wipe becomes a redeposit tool.
Clarity on scope: TX612 is non-sterile. It supports controlled cleaning and spill pickup, but it does not create a sterility claim.
If your workflow requires sterile presentation/transfer, use sterile consumables and follow your transfer procedures.
Specs at a glance (quick reference)
| Product |
Texwipe TechniCloth® TX612 |
| Format |
Dry cleanroom wiper (nonwoven) |
| Size |
12" x 12" nominal |
| Substrate |
Hydroentangled nonwoven cellulose / polyester blend (commonly referenced as 55% cellulose / 45% polyester) |
| Edge |
Cut edge |
| Sterility |
Non-sterile |
| Packaging |
Bag-in-bag cleanroom packaging with lot traceability |
| Pack configuration |
Commonly referenced: 150 wipers/bag; 10 bags/case (1,500/case) (verify per current documentation and received lots) |
| Typical positioning |
General wiping and spill control in controlled environments (confirm suitability by method and acceptance criteria) |
Receiving control: For controlled programs, treat SKU + pack as configuration control. Bag counts and packaging style matter for staging, dispensing, and method consistency.
What it’s for
TX612 is positioned for routine wipe-down and high-absorbency pickup where you want a cleanroom-manufactured,
solvent-compatible nonwoven that can capture aqueous spills and support controlled damp-film cleaning.
Common use includes benches and stainless wipe-downs, fixture/equipment exterior cleaning, staging-area wipe-downs, and
controlled spill response where blot-and-lift behavior is the priority.
Decision drivers (why customers standardize TX612)
- Absorbency-first control: blend construction supports pickup and spill control where absorbency is the limiting factor.
- Method flexibility: dry wipe enables controlled chemistry application to the wipe (damp-film) without committing to a presaturated format.
- Low extractables focus (typicals): often selected when residue control matters for general cleaning steps (confirm NVR/ionic limits per current documentation).
- Nonwoven geometry advantage: performs well for blotting and pickup versus knit architectures that may be preferred for ultra-finish steps.
- Packaging discipline: bag-in-bag packaging supports controlled introduction and lot traceability for investigations.
Materials and construction
TX612 is a hydroentangled nonwoven made from a cellulose / polyester blend.
Practically, that means you get the absorbency behavior of cellulose combined with the strength and durability contribution of polyester.
Hydroentanglement builds mechanical integrity without chemical binders, which is one reason these wipes are used in controlled environments where extractables matter.
The edge is typically listed as a cut edge. In real use, edge behavior is controlled more by pressure, directionality, and how long the wipe is overworked
than by any single spec line. If your process is edge-sensitive (abrasive corners, rails, sharp features), validate on the geometry that actually causes failures.
Proper wiping technique (required for performance and control)
1) Bag control
Open only to remove what you will use immediately; reclose inner bag to reduce handling contamination.
|
2) Blot / lift first
For spills: place, absorb, lift. Avoid scrubbing that spreads contamination.
|
3) Lane discipline
Straight, overlapping passes (10–20% overlap). Clean-to-less-clean flow; do not backtrack.
|
4) Change-out triggers
Replace when loaded, smearing, streaking, or losing structure. Overworking drives redeposit.
|
- Fold and rotate faces: Use a consistent fold pattern; rotate to a clean face after each pass/section.
- Damp-film technique: If using chemistry (e.g., IPA), apply to the wiper to reach a controlled damp state; avoid flooding seams and corners.
- One-direction strokes: Straight, overlapping passes; avoid casual back-and-forth scrubbing that redistributes soil.
- Detail geometry: For grooves, ports, and seams, switch to a swab rather than forcing a flat wipe into confined features.
Method standardization tip: If results differ by operator, lock four variables in the SOP: fold pattern, wetness target, stroke count per surface, and discard point.
Cleanliness and performance metrics (manufacturer-typical values)
Cleanroom wiper “typicals” are a qualification starting point. The useful interpretation is by mechanism:
particles/fibers (shedding), NVR (residue risk), ions (compatibility/corrosion risk), and sorbency (pickup behavior).
Validate against your current documentation and your own surface/soil window.
| Metric |
Typical value |
Why it matters |
| Basis weight |
~69 g/m2 |
Handling feel, durability, and pickup behavior. |
| Sorptive capacity |
~360 mL/m2 |
Pickup capacity for spills/films; informs change-out triggers. |
| Sorptive rate |
<0.3 seconds |
How quickly the wipe wets and absorbs during pickup. |
| Particles (LPC ≥ 0.5 µm) |
~7.2 x 107 particles/m2 |
Inputs to contamination risk assessment and qualification. |
| Fibers > 100 µm |
~5.5 x 104 fibers/m2 |
Fiber-load inputs for sensitivity gating. |
| NVR (DI water extractant) |
~0.003 g/m2 |
Residue risk indicator under aqueous extraction. |
| NVR (IPA extractant) |
~0.025 g/m2 |
Residue risk indicator under solvent extraction behavior. |
| Ions (typical) |
Low-level ionic extractables reported (e.g., Na, K, Cl, SO4, NH4) — confirm the current table for your process limits |
Ionic contamination inputs for sensitive processes and corrosion/ECM discussions. |
Interpretation tip: Treat typicals as a screening tool. Qualify on your actual surfaces, soils, and solvent window, and tie acceptance to your internal limits (particles, residues, ions).
Common failure modes (what creates spread, streaks, and rework)
The most common failure mode during spill response is scrubbing instead of pickup. Scrubbing spreads the event and can drive liquid into seams and interfaces.
For routine wipe-downs, the failure mode is re-wiping with a loaded face, which redeposits residues and creates streaking.
Prevent both by standardizing blot/lift, using lane discipline, rotating faces, and discarding early when pickup efficiency drops.
Where it fits in a cleanroom wiping program
TX612 fits as a general-purpose, absorbency-forward cleanroom wiper for controlled environments that need reliable pickup and a controlled method.
For ultra-sensitive finishing steps (optics, high-gloss coatings, extreme particle limits), many programs define a separate “final pass” wipe strategy and qualify a different substrate/edge style as needed.
The correct approach is to gate by risk: absorbency control vs. ultra-low lint vs. residue/ionic limits vs. sterile transfer requirements.
Terminology note: Engineered for low-linting performance; no wiper is truly “lint-free” in every process condition.
Closest competitors (comparison framework)
Compare TX612 against other cleanroom nonwoven cellulose/polyester blend wipes used for general wiping and spill control. The differences that matter usually show up in:
(1) extractables/residue profile (NVR), (2) fiber/particle typicals, (3) wet strength under your solvent window, and (4) packaging discipline and traceability support.
If your dominant failure mode is edge-driven fiber release on abrasive paths, a sealed-edge polyester knit architecture may be a more defensible control. If your dominant failure mode is spill spread and wipe count, prioritize absorbency-forward constructions and validate residue/finish outcomes.
Recommended non-sterile pairings (sterility alignment enforced)
TX612 is a non-sterile product. All pairings below are intentionally non-sterile to avoid implied sterility claims and to support audit-ready program design.
Align final selection to your SOPs and qualification requirements.
-
Non-sterile solution pairing (dry-wiper method control):
Texwipe TX167 Non-Sterile 70% IPA (16 oz.)
— supports controlled damp-film cleaning when applied to the wiper (avoid flooding seams; validate finish/residue behavior on your surfaces).
-
Non-sterile cleanroom glove pairing (SOSCleanroom approved):
-
Non-sterile cleanroom swabs (corners, seams, ports, detail cleaning):
-
Non-sterile cleanroom labels for kit/status control:
Texwipe TX515 Cleanroom Labels 1.5" x 1.5"
-
Method upgrade (handling and dispense control):
Cleanroom wiper dispensers (category)
— reduces touch contamination, supports one-at-a-time dispensing, and helps operators maintain “bag control” without improvised staging.
Pairing discipline: Non-sterile products are paired only with non-sterile consumables. Sterile items should be referenced only when the featured product itself is sterile and the workflow explicitly requires sterile transfer and handling.
Glove discipline: Change gloves when contaminated, solvent-wet, torn, or after contacting non-controlled surfaces. During wiping, gloves are often the dominant contamination vector.
Why buy ITW Texwipe TechniCloth® TX612 from SOSCleanroom
- Configuration control: Wipe performance is method-sensitive; ordering by exact SKU + pack helps prevent substitutions that change pickup, residues, and fiber behavior.
- Audit readiness support: We help customers locate current manufacturer documentation (TDS/SDS) and align receiving controls to lot traceability expectations.
- One-cart procurement: Pair TX612 with non-sterile cleanroom gloves, swabs, labels, dispensers, and IPA so your method stays consistent across operators and shifts.
Manufacturer documentation (authoritative references)
-
ITW Texwipe TechniCloth® TDS (includes TX612 family typicals):
Click Here
-
Standards bodies (method overview pages):
IEST
|
ASTM
-
ISO 14644-5:2025 operations standard overview (ISO listing):
Click Here
If you have any questions please email us at Sales@SOSsupply.com or give us a call at (214)340-8574.
OR check out the AI ChatBot powered by SOSCleanroom data libraries - give it a try! THIS IS NEW FOR 2026!
Disclaimer: This Technical Vault content is provided for general guidance only. It does not create or replace your facility SOPs,
validation/qualification, risk assessments, training requirements, or regulator/customer expectations. Always follow your approved procedures, current manufacturer
documentation (TDS/SDS), EHS controls, and applicable standards. Product selection and use must be confirmed by your internal quality and safety stakeholders for
the intended surfaces, residues, and process requirements.
© 2026 SOSCleanroom. All rights reserved.