A practical, technically grounded guide to identifying difficult-to-remove contamination, selecting suitable chemistry, interpreting low-residue claims, and connecting the right cleaning media to the right controlled-environment task. DIRECT ANSWER | WHY THE CLEANING CHEMISTRY MATTERS Alcohol is useful—but not universal. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) can be appropriate for some soluble soils and for separately qualified disinfection applications. It is not a dependable substitute for detergent when a surface carries persistent oily film, certain salts, adhesive residue or other soils that the selected alcohol concentration does not effectively remove. Rapid evaporation can leave nonvolatile contamination behind. The key choice is not simply alcohol or detergent. It is a system of soil chemistry, surface, cleaner, wipe or mop, water quality, rinse/removal approach and verification. Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization are different objectives; one product should not be presumed to perform all three. Cleanrooms are operated to reduce contamination risk, but the word clean is often used to describe several very different outcomes. Understanding the distinction prevents customers from purchasing a disinfectant when they need soil removal—or a detergent when they need a validated microbial-control claim. The European Union Good Manufacturing Practice (EU GMP) Annex 1, section 4.33, explicitly calls for prior cleaning to remove surface contamination and for cleaning programs to remove disinfectant residues. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also identifies cleaning as an essential preliminary step before disinfection or sterilization. These principles explain why detergent and rinse decisions belong in contamination-control planning; neither document makes every cleanroom detergent suitable for every process. See Removing Disinfectant Residue Without Compromising Contact Time for the complementary discussion of label-required wet contact time. Alcohol-water mixtures are common because they wet many surfaces, evaporate, and can dissolve some organic contamination. Their limitations depend on the contaminant, alcohol concentration, co-solvents, wiping media, surface, and amount of mechanical removal. There is no scientifically defensible rule that “70% IPA removes all cleanroom residues.” IPA can evaporate while dissolved or suspended nonvolatile substances remain on the surface. A dry appearance is not evidence of low ionic or organic residue. Inorganic salts and water-soluble deposits can respond differently from light oils. Water chemistry, wetting, controlled removal and rinsing may matter more than alcohol percentage alone. Adhesives, greasy deposits and some cured films may require a formulated detergent or degreaser and a removal mechanism rather than repeated fast-drying alcohol passes. Acrylic, polycarbonate, coatings, seals and elastomers can respond differently to repeated IPA, surfactants, oxidants or strong mechanical wiping. A saturated, overloaded or poorly matched wipe may redistribute contamination. Particle generation, absorbency, chemical compatibility and clean-face discipline matter. A sterile IPA container does not prove that a previous detergent residue is gone; a detergent has no automatic microbial kill claim or sporicidal performance. An IPA-containing product is also not automatically a disinfectant. For example, Micronova NovaHol (NH1) is documented as a surfactant cleaner containing 25% IPA for faster drying. That is not equivalent to Texwipe sterile 70% IPA (TX3270) in formulation, role or sterile status. See our cleaning-versus-disinfection guide for definitions and context. A surfactant is a surface-active chemical. Many surfactant molecules contain a water-attracting region and an oil-attracting region. In appropriate formulations, they improve wetting and help disperse or lift soils that plain water or alcohol alone may not remove effectively. Mechanical wiping or mopping and collection of the lifted contamination remain important. For a practical comparison of why an analytical number cannot be understood without a test method, see the Texwipe Wiper Qualification guide and the Cleaning Validation: Total Organic Carbon, HPLC and Recovery guide. A persistent stain, film or haze should be treated as evidence to investigate—not as a diagnosis. Similar visual symptoms can arise from different contaminants. The most effective educational starting point is to ask what might be present and which evidence distinguishes plausible causes. The goal is to avoid the expensive failure of treating the wrong contaminant. For visual troubleshooting, read Why Cleanroom Surfaces Look Streaky, Sticky or Hazy After Cleaning. For contamination transfer that affects bonding, see Silicone Contamination Before Adhesive Bonding and Coating. SOSCleanroom offers several Micronova cleaning formulations with different intended uses. The table below summarizes manufacturer-described attributes and SOScleanroom catalog listings; it is not a ranking of cleaning efficacy, a recommendation for a sterile grade, or a claim that any of these cleaners has been tested against a particular facility’s contamination limits. Packaging matters: The listed NC2 configuration is 1-gallon bottles, four per case; SC1-P is a 16-ounce bottle with six per case; NH1 is listed in a 1-gallon format with four bottles per case. For NC1 and MC1, check the product page for the currently offered gallon or pail configurations and ordering unit before approving a purchase. The manufacturer’s documented ISO 5–9 intended-use range must not be interpreted as sterile status or automatic suitability for a critical aseptic process. In fact, Micronova documents NC2, NH1, MC1 and SC1-P as not irradiated; none of the reviewed product specifications establishes a sterile product claim. Refer to the facility quality owner where sterile chemistry is required. Different cleaning challenges often require entirely different removal mechanisms. The following examples are a buyer’s discussion aid: the named products are candidates for evaluation, not facility-approved pairings or use instructions. To understand how floor chemistry can influence resistance testing rather than merely appearance, use ESD Floor Cleaning: Protecting Static-Dissipative Performance. For a fuller discussion of surface chemistry and finishes, see Cleanroom Surface Compatibility & Cleaning. Cleanroom surfaces are not a single material. Stainless steel may be electropolished or passivated. Polymer shields can be acrylic or polycarbonate. Floors can use epoxy, vinyl, urethane or conductive coatings. Seals and tubing may be silicone or other elastomers. A cleaner suitable for one substrate cannot be assumed safe for the entire work area. For abrasive-sensitive and coating-sensitive applications, use the surface compatibility guide before considering a more aggressive cleaner or sponge. A cleaner may lift soil but still require removal of loosened material and any detergent remainder. Rinsing can be important; equally, an inappropriate water source can introduce new mineral, ionic, microbial or organic contamination. Neither the need for a rinse nor the appropriate water grade can be inferred from an “ISO cleanroom” label alone. Deionized (DI) water, reverse-osmosis (RO) water, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Purified Water and Water for Injection (WFI) are not interchangeable grades. Their specifications, intended uses and controls differ. Read DI vs. RO vs. USP Purified Water vs. WFI for a dedicated explanation. This distinction is critical for pharmaceutical readers and any supplier offering chemistry to controlled environments. A product can be manufactured for ISO Class 5–9 cleanrooms and still lack the sterile claim needed for a particular aseptic application. ISO 14644 airborne cleanliness classification does not, by itself, determine chemical sterile status. These statements are from the European Commission’s 2022 Annex 1 for manufacture of sterile medicinal products. Applicability depends on the facility, market, product and quality system. They do not automatically apply identically to every electronics or industrial cleanroom, and a detergent’s published particle-filtration claim cannot be substituted for its sterile-status documentation. For U.S. drug manufacturing, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides cleaning-validation guidance and Good Manufacturing Practice requirements that emphasize reproducible cleaning and management of residues. FDA also notes that detergent residues themselves need evaluation, not merely the residues from the product being processed. Read the related cleaning validation guide for terminology, sampling considerations and analytical methods. A visual inspection is useful for finding spots, films or corrosion, but it cannot reliably quantify all contamination. A scientifically stronger approach matches the suspected soil to a relevant measurement, with a known blank, recovery characteristics, acceptance criterion and documented sampling location. These are examples of evidence types, not a universal validation protocol. The core buyer question is not “Does this cleaner leave zero residue?” but “What acceptance limits matter, and what evidence supports the selected chemistry and finished surface?” For deeper detail, consult Cleaning Validation: TOC, HPLC and Recovery Studies and Particle, NVR and Ion Testing for Wipers. The following are illustrative situations, not documented customer incidents or instructions to change an approved program. They help procurement, operators and quality teams ask better questions when routine cleaning does not produce the expected result. Possible contributors include a thin nonvolatile film, wipe redeposition, incompatible chemistry or irreversible polymer surface damage. A process owner might compare water-based low-ionic cleaner documentation, surface compatibility and a repeatable inspection criterion. Product-selection implication: NC2 or NH1 are candidate product families, provided the specific panel and application are qualified. Accumulation, dilution variation, floor finish chemistry or changes to electrical behavior may contribute. Visual cleanup alone cannot prove static-control performance. Product-selection implication: NC1 is intended for floor cleaning; pair any chemistry review with the existing ESD floor-monitoring program. Repeated IPA wiping may spread some adhesive formulations or leave a faint film. Investigate the adhesive source, cart finish and whether a heavy-duty degreaser is appropriate. Product-selection implication: MC1 is a candidate for adhesive-related soils on compatible maintenance surfaces. The issue may be removable surface oxide or a sign of corrosion, incompatible chemistry or damaged finish. Cleaning should not conceal a maintenance concern. Product-selection implication: SC1-P is intended for stainless/metal oxidation and residue, subject to equipment and process assessment. The proper question is whether the labeled contact period was completed and what removal is permitted. Unplanned immediate wipe-back could compromise a microbial-control step. Product-selection implication: Consider only site-approved cleaning and rinse options, using the separate disinfectant-residue guide. Possible variables include concentrate dilution, water grade, equipment geometry, soil load, wipe material, lot, dwell/exposure and final inspection method. Product-selection implication: Use identical acceptance criteria, controlled consumables and the current manufacturer documentation before comparing performance. A buyer does not have to be a formulation chemist to ask technically useful questions. The goal is to prevent a product substitution from changing the cleaning system without the right site review. For procurement teams managing alternative supplies, the most helpful documentation package includes current product code, manufacturer specification, SDS, available certificate, container quantity and a statement of intended application. See the full Technical Vault for related consumable-qualification guides. These are verified SOSCleanroom catalog destinations, not a preapproved chemical-and-tool package. Cleaners and media should be evaluated together for the material, soil, cleanliness objectives, required sterile status and controlled-environment restrictions. Ready-to-use, low-ionic, 0.1 µm-filtered surfactant cleaner. Manufacturer documentation describes free-rinsing properties and use on compatible glass, stainless steel, acrylic and painted surfaces. Selection note: Use as a product comparison for low-residue workstation and clear-panel cleaning. Concentrated cleanroom detergent intended for compatible floor and broader surface-cleaning tasks. Manufacturer describes low-ionic chemistry and fine filtration. Selection note: Evaluate dilution controls, water grade, floor-coating compatibility and ESD requirements. Ready-to-use surfactant cleaner with 25% isopropyl alcohol, 0.1 µm filtration and low-ionic intent; differentiated from pure IPA cleaning solutions. Selection note: Compare drying time, residue, compatibility and intended cleaner role; not a 70% IPA disinfectant substitute. No-drip, phosphorus-free stainless steel gel cleanser supplied in 16 oz bottles. Manufacturer targets rust, oxidation and residue on stainless and metal. Selection note: Review finish sensitivity, corrosion cause, permitted surfaces and the NSF A7 nonfood-contact designation. Water-soluble, biodegradable, non-flammable heavy-duty detergent/degreaser positioned for adhesive, grease and selected industrial process-related soils. Selection note: Review the exact current filtration specification, safety data and residue removal for the facility. Dry, cleanroom-processed, continuous-filament polyester knit wiper offered for controlled solvent application and removal of compatible soils. Selection note: Consider cleanroom class, edge construction, particle/releasable data and suitable wipe change frequency. Smaller polyester wiper for localized cleaning and higher placement control on precision fixtures and smaller equipment zones. Selection note: Choose smaller geometry when it benefits the task, not merely because the area is classified. Absorbent cellulose/polyester nonwoven wiper for general controlled-environment cleaning and aqueous liquid pickup. Selection note: Review its listed ISO range and fiber/particle needs; it is not interchangeable with every polyester wiper. Large flexible-head closed-cell foam swab for compatible hard-to-reach features, seams or localized cleaning work. Selection note: Evaluate foam/handle chemical compatibility, tip dimensions and the need for a sterile alternative. Explore more choices in Cleanroom Cleaners, Cleanroom Wipers, Mops and Covers and Precision Swabs. For how wiping media and chemical solutions interact, consult Matching Cleanroom Solutions with Wipers & Swabs and Cleanroom Wiper Folding and One-Direction Cleaning. No. IPA and water dissolve certain soils, but performance is dependent on the specific residue. Insoluble or poorly soluble films, adhered deposits, and some ionic or adhesive contamination may require a different cleaner and a qualified removal step. No. Low-ionic is a formulation attribute related to specified mobile ions. It is not proof of zero nonvolatile residue, zero total organic carbon, zero particles or absence of cleaning chemistry on a finished surface. Volatile components may evaporate before the original nonvolatile material is fully removed. Wipe redeposition, rinsing-water quality, surfactant carryover or actual polymer damage can produce similar appearance. The visual symptom alone cannot establish the cause. No. Filtration is one manufacturing characteristic. Sterile status requires specific manufacturer claims and supporting evidence; dissolved ions are not removed merely because a solution passed through a small-pore filter. No. NovaHol NH1 is a low-ionic surfactant cleaner with 25% IPA in the manufacturer specification. Sterile 70% IPA is a different composition and product category with different documentation and intended-use considerations. Not automatically. The surface, product label, soil, end use, residue acceptance criteria and the quality owner’s approved process determine whether rinsing is required and with what water grade. Do not infer that. EU GMP Annex 1 section 4.35 states that detergents and disinfectants used in Grade A/B should be sterile before use. Manufacturer statements about intended ISO-class use are not a substitute for verified sterile status and facility qualification. A product may be described as removing rust or oxidation, but that does not establish that underlying metal integrity, passivation or required surface finish has been restored. Recurring corrosion may need engineering evaluation. Do not improvise chemical mixtures. The correct approach is to follow manufacturer labeling, Safety Data Sheets and facility-approved chemical compatibility controls. Certain mixtures can be hazardous or alter performance. The wipe must collect the mobilized soil without introducing unacceptable particles, fibers or extractables. Material, edge, absorbency, dimensions and compatibility can change the result even when the same cleaner is used. No single universal test exists. Visual inspection, TOC, NVR, ion testing, recovery studies and other methods address different questions. Acceptance criteria and methods belong to the facility’s quality system. Provide the surface material, suspected soil, controlled-area requirements, whether sterility is required, existing chemicals, desired package size and any compatibility or residue limits. This enables a product-information discussion while the facility retains approval responsibility. The scientific and product attributes in this guide are based on identifiable primary sources and the live SOScleanroom catalog. Where technical documents are older or different published versions disagree, the facility should obtain the latest approved product-specific literature before treating a number as an acceptance criterion. Source limitation: References describe different regulatory environments and product groups. No cited source establishes that every detergent discussed is sterile or approved for direct product-contact cleaning. Historical guidance and marketing claims must not displace current regulations, manufacturer instructions or a facility’s controlled documentation. PRODUCT EDUCATION FIRST. BETTER SELECTION FOLLOWS. SOSCleanroom can help customers locate product specifications, evaluate available pack sizes, identify relevant wiping media and compare manufacturer-described attributes. Facility quality owners remain responsible for approving cleaners, required sterile status, procedures and contamination acceptance criteria.When Alcohol Is Not Enough: Cleanroom Detergents, Specialty Cleaners & Residue Removal
Three different jobs: cleaning, disinfection and residue control
Objective
What success means
What a buyer must not assume
Cleaning
Physical and chemical removal of soil, films, particles, residues or deposits from a particular surface.
That a cleaning product has a disinfectant, sporicidal or sterilizing claim.
Disinfection
Reduction or inactivation of specified microorganisms under the product label, relevant use conditions and approved program.
That a disinfectant necessarily removes oils, mineral salts or residual layers left by earlier processes.
Residue control
Control of what remains after a process: cleaner carryover, disinfectant residues, mobile ions, organics and potentially other extractables.
That visually clear, streak-free or dry surfaces meet analytical acceptance limits.
Why alcohol sometimes cleans poorly—even when the surface looks dry
Dry is not the same as clean
Salts may need a different removal mechanism
Heavy or tacky films may simply be smeared
More aggressive does not always mean better
The wiping medium can undo the chemistry
Cleaning and killing are separate questions
How surfactants, filtration and low-ionic formulations actually work
Four product claims that deserve different interpretations
Identify the residue before choosing chemistry
Potential residue or soil
What may be observed
Selection question worth asking
Mobile ions / dried water deposits
Spots, conductive contamination or analytical-ion excursions; sometimes no visible indication.
Is the concern a water-soluble salt, the rinse water, an incoming material or another source?
Oily fingerprints / grease
Smears, handling marks or persistent film on equipment exteriors.
Is a low-ionic surfactant or stronger compatible degreaser appropriate?
Disinfectant carryover
Repeated film, tackiness or surface finish change after disinfection cycles.
Was the required contact time completed and what residue-removal approach is permitted afterward?
Adhesive / tape transfer
Tacky lines at mat edges, labels, carts, fixtures or packaging stations.
Is a cleaner intended for adhesive-type soils and is the substrate tolerant?
Rust / oxidation
Brown marks or discoloration on susceptible metal surfaces.
Is a stainless-specific treatment appropriate, and is there underlying corrosion requiring maintenance review?
Particles / fibers / abrasive residue
Localized specks or scratches, sometimes worsening after repeated wiping.
Is the wipe, tool, application pressure or prior cleaning material introducing defects?
Process-specific films
Photoresist, flux-like or coating residue on maintenance equipment and fixtures.
Does the supplier document the soil type, and is this surface in the approved cleaning scope?
Five Micronova cleanroom cleaners compared: what is different and why it matters
Cleaner / SOS SKU
Formulation and purpose
Manufacturer-listed differentiator
Typical selection consideration
NovaClean Lab & Glass (NC2)
Ready-to-use, non-solvent-based low-ionic surfactant for glass, acrylic, stainless and painted surfaces.
Filtered to 0.1 µm; described as low NVR and free-rinsing.
Workstations and transparent or painted surfaces where low-ionic cleaning chemistry is the priority.
NovaClean Floor Clean (NC1)
Concentrated low-ionic detergent for floors and other compatible controlled-environment surfaces.
Filtered to 0.1 µm; manufacturer describes a range of prepared-use solution yield.
Higher-volume cleaning or managed floor-cleaning programs that require controlled dilution and water quality.
NovaHol (NH1)
Ready-to-use surfactant cleaner with 25% IPA—not 70% IPA.
Filtered to 0.1 µm; designed for faster dry time; low-ionic intent.
Compatible glass, acrylic, curtain or metal surface cleaning when faster drying is beneficial.
StainlessClean Gel (SC1-P)
No-drip stainless steel gel cleaner for oxidation, rust and residue buildup on metal.
16 oz gel; phosphorus-free, no VOCs per manufacturer; NSF A7 (metal polishes, nonfood-contact).
Localized stainless or metal-finish problems with a defined removal and compatibility check.
MegaClean (MC1)
Heavy-duty, water-soluble detergent/degreaser for grease, adhesives and other heavier soils.
Non-flammable and biodegradable per manufacturer; current product specification describes 0.1 µm filtration.
Heavy soils, clean-build maintenance and spot-cleaning where a light detergent is insufficient.
Match the soil, surface and cleaning goal—not just the product name
Illustrative situation
First question for the facility
Product family to investigate
What could disqualify the option
Glass shield or acrylic panel develops a mild film
Is the problem ordinary surface film or chemical damage to the substrate?
NovaClean Lab & Glass or NovaHol where compatible.
Material incompatibility, unapproved residue profile, incorrect sterile status, or required surface-specific restriction.
Conductive cleanroom flooring shows persistent cleaning haze
Could residue accumulation change documented electrostatic-dissipative (ESD) performance?
NovaClean Floor Clean within an approved floor-maintenance program.
Floor-coating requirements, water/dilution variability, unavailable resistance verification or unsuitable handling.
Stainless fixture has oxidation or buildup in seams
Is this removable cosmetic buildup or corrosion that affects equipment integrity?
StainlessClean Gel for appropriate metal exteriors.
Product-contact concerns, risk to passivation/finish, residual film, or equipment-manufacturer restrictions.
Cart or threshold has adhesive/tacky-mat transfer
Is the soil adhesive, a floor-finish defect or a coating film?
MegaClean for compatible heavy-duty cleaning situations.
Sensitive paint/polymer, cleaning-agent residue limits, prohibited chemicals or lack of approved containment.
Stainless workstation has light fingerprints and fast dry is desired
Will a surfactant-plus-IPA blend outperform alcohol-only wipe-down for the specific soil?
NovaHol or NovaClean Lab & Glass.
Need for sterile chemistry, contact-time requirements for a separate disinfectant or incompatible finish.
Area shows persistent residue after a sporicidal treatment
Has the disinfectant’s required contact period elapsed, and does its label allow follow-on removal?
A compatible detergent, an approved rinse medium or other site-qualified technique.
Label conflict, inadequate microbial kill contact time or introduction of nonsterile chemistry in a critical area.
Surface compatibility: a cleaner can remove one problem and create another
Compatibility questions worth documenting
Rinse water, free-rinsing chemistry and the risk of adding contamination back
What a quality owner should consider
What Annex 1 actually says—and why ISO classification is not a sterile-cleaner approval
Three concise points from EU GMP Annex 1
How do you know a surface is actually clean? Choose evidence that measures the concern
Evidence type
What it can help reveal
Important limitation
Visual examination
Haze, streaks, particles, stains and physical damage under defined illumination.
Invisible ionic or organic contamination may remain.
Nonvolatile residue (NVR)
Material left following evaporation under a specified analytical method.
Results depend on extractant, sampling and method; it is not chemical identification.
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
An aggregate measure of organic carbon in a suitable extract or sample.
Not specific to a single detergent, disinfectant, active ingredient or source.
Ion chromatography / conductivity
Soluble ionic species or aggregate conductive content in suitable extracts.
Does not detect all nonionic films, particles or the identity of every contaminant.
Swab or rinse recovery studies
Recoverable residues from representative surfaces or equipment.
Recovery depends on surface, sampling area, technique, solvent and analytical method.
Microbiological surface monitoring
Microbial contamination trends in an appropriately designed program.
Does not independently demonstrate that chemical detergent residue is absent.
Surface resistance testing (ESD)
Electrical behavior of static-dissipative floors or work surfaces.
Not a general-purpose chemical-cleanliness test.
Six troubleshooting scenarios that expose common cleaning mistakes
Acrylic vision panel looks clean when wet but hazy when dry
Conductive floor has progressively dull or patchy areas
Equipment cart has tacky adhesive marks after mat replacement
Stainless housing shows orange-brown discoloration
Disinfectant leaves a persistent visible layer
Two teams use the same cleaner but get different results
A practical purchasing and quality-documentation checklist
Shop relevant cleaners, wipers and precision-cleaning tools at SOSCleanroom
Cleaning chemistry: five differentiated Micronova products
Micronova NovaClean Lab & Glass
Micronova NovaClean Floor Clean
Micronova NovaHol Cleaner
Micronova StainlessClean Gel
Micronova MegaClean Heavy-Duty Cleaner
Supporting cleaning media: match the tool to the chemistry
Texwipe AlphaWipe TX1009
Texwipe AlphaWipe TX1004
Texwipe TechniCloth TX609
Texwipe CleanFoam TX710A
Frequently asked questions about cleanroom detergents and IPA
1. Does 70% IPA remove all cleanroom residues?
2. Is a low-ionic cleaner the same as a zero-residue cleaner?
3. Why can a surface look hazy again after the IPA dries?
4. Does 0.1-micrometer filtration make a cleaner sterile?
5. Is NovaHol NH1 equivalent to sterile 70% IPA?
6. Should every detergent-cleaned surface be rinsed?
7. Can a detergent be used in EU GMP Grade A or Grade B if advertised for ISO 5?
8. Will a stainless steel cleaner restore a corroded surface to qualified condition?
9. Can cleaning products be mixed to improve performance?
10. Why is a cleanroom wipe part of cleaner selection?
11. Which test proves a surface is chemically clean?
12. What is the most useful information to give SOSCleanroom when requesting a recommendation?
Manufacturer specifications, regulatory references and source integrity
Need help identifying the right cleaner for your surface and soil?
SOSCLEANROOM | TECHNICAL VAULT | CLEANING CHEMISTRY & RESIDUE CONTROL
IPA vs. detergents Micronova cleaner comparison Ionic & organic residues Stainless steel & polymers Rinse-water quality GMP Grade A/B caveat
01 / Technical guide
02 / Technical guide
01 / Evaporation
02 / Solubility
03 / Soil loading
04 / Surface risk
05 / Wiper selection
06 / Microbial claims
03 / Technical guide
04 / Technical guide
05 / Technical guide
06 / Technical guide
07 / Technical guide
08 / Technical guide
09 / Technical guide
10 / Technical guide
11 / Technical guide
Illustrative scenario 1
Illustrative scenario 2
Illustrative scenario 3
Illustrative scenario 4
Illustrative scenario 5
Illustrative scenario 6
12 / Technical guide
13 / Technical guide
NC2 / Ready-to-use / lab & glass
NC1 / Concentrate / floor cleaning
NH1 / Fast drying / surfactant + IPA
SC1-P / Specialty gel / metal
MC1 / Heavy soil / degreasing
TX1009 / Polyester / 9 × 9 in
TX1004 / Polyester / 4 × 4 in
TX609 / Cellulose-polyester / 9 × 9 in
TX710A / Precision foam swab
15 / Technical guide
16 / Technical guide